,validPeriod= 2 -> But the recent discovery of paleoantropologiczne should have us accustomed to such astonishments. Time to acknowledge that the Homo sapiens , the strangest species on Earth, have also have a strange history. After paradoxical species could arise in the normal way. Should we be surprised when something not quite fit into the predetermined pattern. Homo Naledi. As discovered a new species of human What these paradoxes – that we should stop to wonder – involve? 1. From time to find the oldest remains of hominids – first Neanderthal in Europe, then the Homo erectus on Java, finally Australopithecus in South Africa – assumed to be careful that our evolution was directional. They ascended the ladder of ever greater humanity until the crowning of this evolution, which was created Homo sapiens . All subsequent discoveries showed, however, that this line has never been. More and less advanced species live in different places and in different areas. Attempts to “insert” further discovered species in the appropriate place for them in our family tree almost always ended in failure. 2. Belief in the existence of one line to be possible, when we had a small number findings, and those arranged themselves in as clear chronological and anatomical image. In our history, there was a trend that characterized, for example. An increase in body size (according to the so-called. Law Cope – former evolutionists have indulged in inventing “rights” which would be subject to the evolution of the species) and the brain. In fact, the oldest australopithecines were small and had small brains, and later people were roślejsi and have bigger brains. Hence the concept of the so-called. Rubicon brain that have long functioned and marked the beginning of the “real people”, ie Homo . They were to arise when the size of the body exceeds a certain threshold, which was initially set at about 750 cc., And later, as new discoveries, had to gradually decline. The recent discovery of the people of Flores, meaning ” Hobbits “ Homo floresiensis , who lived almost contemporary and almost contemporary way to behave – hunting, were making sophisticated tools, able to stir up the fire, but the brains were no bigger than a chimpanzee, aroused no less sensational than the discovery There are new evidence Hobbit 3. The concept of linear development chimed also convinced of fairly uniform changes throughout our anatomy – arms, legs or head should evolve at the same time as the transition to new environments and changes way of life. From forms of arboreal we became ground, with herbivores – carnivores (or rather wszystkożerni), with not too witted – wise, But the subsequent discoveries – including the Lee Berger, who now discovered in a cave near Johannesburg Rising Star remains Homo Naledi – completely invalidate this belief: almost all of the new species show a mosaic of primitive and advanced features. Sometimes the features australopitekowym accompanied by some that we used to combine the most advanced Homo . This was the case of “hobbits” that began even suspect that may be derived from Australopithecus, although these They never – apparently – from Africa did not come out and lived a few million years earlier. The same was true of the so-called. people and Georgian (Man of Dmanisi) and discovered recently by Berger in the not so distant from Rising Star Cave Malapane remains Australopithecus sediba as well as with many even older than Australopithecus forms from Africa – Sahelanthropus, orrorin, ardipitekiem – which different parts of the skeletal suitable for a variety of later cells in our lineage. Top 50 sq. m anthropology On subsequent discoveries still read about the mosaic features of monkey and human, often within the same part of the body (eg. human teeth, monkey brains, or even a monkey teeth, human molars), but it just shows how such distinctions are misleading. Monkey model and human model could be considered a meaningful indicator of evolutionary change, if there was a one way “from ape to man” and had “man” meant one set of characteristics that characterizes our species. But if the human species were so many, these “models” refer only to our deep-rooted beliefs – and nothing more. 4. This combines the concept of species. When naming the next odkrywanym forms also we recognize that each of them not only filled a gap in our family tree, but also that it was independent of the others and occupied distinct ecological niche delimited from other impassable barriers. But since the time when we examined the genomes of humans and other primates, and we know how few of us differs from the chimpanzee or gorilla, we realize that the genetic differences between the various hominids were negligible, and the possibility of interbreeding – huge. This was confirmed Research paleogenetyczne – “fossil” genes of Neanderthals and so. Denisovans (properly known only from very few genes and fossils) have shown that the hybridization was in our history a common occurrence, if not universal, and so many of these “new species” may be hybrids, whose separation from the other population is illusory. Thus, even a metaphor for the tree seems to be in relation to our history far-fetched – Berger quite rightly refers to the comparison with pouring a river whose branches separate from the others that later made them reunite before resuming their rupture. The King of ancient DNA who unmasked the Neanderthal 5. This tells at the end refer to the chronology, what if a discovery in a cave Rising Star is crucial, because the bones so far failed to date and completely do not know how much they are old – or young. Linearity of our evolution require that the species more primitive vein before, and more advanced – afterwards, but it, along with the statement of mosaicism our evolution and the degree of hybridization her cell becomes more problematic. Except that all the bones are in soft sediment and surface, which seems almost unequivocally suggest that they are very young – they can have a dozen or so, tens of thousands of years; if they were actually about two million years old, they should be in solid rock and be deeply buried sediments. And if you are young is the biggest mystery of this discovery – the alleged intentional their burial by so primitive and ancient creatures – may be a simpler explanation: at this time and in these areas the veins have other and more advanced hominids (including, perhaps, the Homo sapiens ), which burials were something natural, even when it came to submitting (or rather dump) to the grave rather than members of their own group as a victim of some intertribal or inter-reckoning. If we have to wait for the new arrangements, in particular the dating of these remains and the discovery of their “fossil” genes – which is conceivable, if they are really young, but rather excluded if their age is counted in the hundreds of thousands or millions of years. These discoveries will have a lot, because we have unearthed a tiny fraction of the sediment resting on the bone. But one thing we can be sure – they all will be amazed. And this is quite normal – indeed it would be strange if anything it turned out there were in line with expectations. Magazine Christmas is something more – more special topics, extraordinary people, the most important events, interesting comments and tasty threads. Every weekend you will learn interesting recipe, inspired in the interpretation of the line and admit that it is a miracle, you will learn what’s hot – in politics, culture, and science. Magazine Christmas: will pick a job, rape women break their crosses One hundred refugees in the city? We can afford. Interview with Prof. Markowski America turns to the right Prince Harry. His Highness Impoliteness Wife closes you in the room. Interview with Jerzy Hoffman Homo sapiens. Father and mother unknown I’m from Vilnius, it shows To assess Login or zarejestrujX
Doctor Bartolo welcomes you in Better World
the first day they brought me one hundred and eleven. Everyone in blue bags. When I first opened, I prayed not to put the child in it
Is proponents of open borders threat jihadis Convention antyprzemocową? And what they feed, they treat and mastering the immigrants? For such doubts responsibility of the Head of the great German concern “Most refugees are young, well-educated and highly motivated. These are the people what we are looking for”
Qualified immigrants should not give the nationality of the kiss hands, and not to put barbed
Drown Government in the bathtub. And then banish Mexicans, and maybe even take the black. Impoverished voters are willing to listen to such slogans
“Thou shalt be king and I did not, so I can do what I like” – he said six-year older brother, Harry. And it’s probably Brits love him
Judge was deaf old man. One of the witnesses says, “Not everything she loved in Poland”. “Oh. Please record: she’s in Poland did not like.” I got a divorce at the first hearing
human ancestral line? Forget. Family tree? Joking. Already sooner pourable river. Monkey human incisors and molars of one jaw – our ancestors play tricks evolutionists
In one of our publications, I heard: “A very good book. These all polonizmy you will indeed remove, but do not worry – we do this “
Now, half a year reading in the price quarter!
But History, Science for everyone
Last find – “missing link” or, as they prefer scientists, “bridge” between bipedal primates and the direct ancestors of man – is so paradoxical that triggered a wave of amazement and comments. Explorers themselves are confused: this is the Homo Naledi we have a surprising mix of primitive traits, monkey, and those close to modern man.
Unusual combination of features within the Homo Naledi makes them difficult to assign to any time a particular level of development of hominids, but very little brain all found skulls leads researchers to attribute it rather to some early it stages or even see them as an intermediate link between australopitekami and early Homo .
inkwizytorstarszy
Oh “gentlemen” priests back to you scholars to freely choose Adas and Eva, about the apple not to mention …
all because 13 500 years ago, “Alien” not cleaned thoroughly its scientific basis for the current Sahara desert, where genetically modify the monkeys brains for new species. Before departure fired loads of hydrogen – from the jungle have done a lot desert – but a bit of debris was …
(most of the artifacts from this period the Vatican “scientists” have long since cleaned or bought from owners of caravans and destroyed, but as you can see they found something again meanly of scientists and you will owieczkom to explain it in his own way …)
And the falsification of the Bible so nicely Church succeeded, big herd could find out …