A simple device can generate millions of loss? Co-founder of The Pirate Bay does not believe, therefore, he believes that publishers are wrong and copying is harmless. Trying to prove this using the Raspberry Pi – me, however, not convinced.
Co- The Pirate Bay with Raspberry Pi He created a device called Kopimashin that copies of 100 songs the same song per second . This simple “experiment” the author wants to show that labels and artists are not wrong to say that copying causes them losses. A copy of no value.
Copying hands do not get dirty?
Look – says Peter Sunde – my Raspberry Pi creates millions of copies of a song, wherein a single piece costs theoretically, $ 1.25. Do are thus poorer for millions of dollars ? Do you disappeared over ten million customers? No! Co-founder of The Pirate Bay believes that his project refutes the logic of publishers and wants his experiment showing at various exhibitions. Probably the admiration will never end, great performance.
There he first came up with a similar idea. In Poland, we have “The loss Kazik” , which is a site that struck his pocket Kazik Staszewski. “Hit” because its founders and many fans believe after all that hearing copied the song is not the same as stealing from the store physical media.
Loss Kazik
Just doliczysz its copy any disc to the losses generated by us – no one said that we must be fierce on Kazik. The price of one plate default estimated at 30 zł. We realize that the plates are sometimes more expensive – in this case, the loss borne by the artists will of course be correspondingly greater than that at this point to our estimates. READ MORE
In total, have already created 20 810 377 copies. Haha, but This Kazik is stupid , thinking that if it was not piracy, it kupilibyśmy 20 810 377 copies. And so it’s not work – think probably participants of the action.
It is all very naive. Indeed, the artist does not lose is not that Sunde made computer which copied his song a million times . We know that the problem is not that the copy is made. The idea is that someone uses them. Instead of the original version.
It’s really hard for me to believe that this absurd argument is still invoked. “But it does not say that if I had not pulled, it obejrzałbym /’d buy /’d listen to / I would read the original”. This does not change the fact that for many it is an alternative. If you have a choice of something for free, and something for which you have to pay will benefit from free option . Even if it is not legal. And that’s a problem.
Theft of theft does not equal
No one would pay for the night in the hotel explaining that if it were not sharing the bed, he would not come over the sea, so it would earn the local vendors. And hotel so do not lose , just because we did not have a client that night. In addition, the bed was uncomfortable, so even better, that “tested” and not naciął on hospitality Janusz, who does not know how it should treat a customer!
In the case of “digital content” no resistance, however, does not and Pirates on the power . I’m sorry, “copies”.
On the one hand, the creator of such shares as Kopimashin or “Loss Kazik ‘catch every word their opponents, but on the other hand, we use the imperfect logic. But it is no coincidence that many repentant pirates switched to on streaming, cheap services such as Spotify or Netflix. They could continue to use pirated version, because the copy has no value, so you can not lose out. But although marginally prefer to support artists.
I do not understand raptures over Kopimashin, because the work of contributors The Pirate Bay withdraws discussions about twenty years. Granted, there are still artists and labels who do not understand the contemporary market, but most adapts to realities. So when in the era of streaming, really cost-effective subscriptions, someone pops up with vulgar slogan “copy no value,” making a fool of himself. Pompous. It is a pity that there is still no shortage of people that support it. It’s probably the perfect proof that piracy is still a big problem and logic “me to be” combined with “I do not do no harm” soon will not disown. Too bad.
No comments:
Post a Comment